We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.
The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ...
Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.
Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.
Author: S. S. Prawer
One of the slimmer volumes in the BFI series, Prawer’s examination of Werner Herzog’s Nosferatu: Phantom der Nacht (1979, and not to be confused with F. W. Murnau’s silent classic of 1921, Nosferatu: Eine Symphonie des Grauens) spends as much time examining Herzog and his idiosyncratic methods as it does the film itself.
While admiring of Herzog’s re-imagining of the Dracula story, Prawer is not so ungracious as to ignore elements of his film that are more successfully conveyed by Murnau’s – and sometimes these things are very subtle, for example the way each director frames their protagonist in a window, and the placement of an actor’s hand, or on a grander scale (the arrival of the fiend’s ship into Germany).
If you’re a casual fan of Herzog’s, this is a good introduction in terms of his biography and early career. This is more useful, however, for film students wanting direct comparisons between the Murnau and Herzog interpretations of the Dracula legend.
Clare Moody