We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.
The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ...
Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.
Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.
Author: John Kenneth Muir
John Kenneth Muir has put pen to paper on many an issue related to film. This time round he’s focused on the 90s and horror for the best part.
There’s a large preface and opening chapter to this book where the author contextualises the scene. The book then looks at a selection of films from each year in the decade. This could range from 24–40 different titles. Hardcore fans will puzzle over some omissions, and perhaps even some insertions (Kathryn Bigelow’s Blue Steel was surely much more a psychological serial killer thriller?).
Each year is also prefaced with a list of news events that were happening around the world from disasters to political appointments. Each film has cast and crew credits listed, a brief non-spoiler synopsis and then a more lengthy commentary by the author. Muir has a good feel for each film (whether they were big releases or straight to video trash). He also gives them a star rating.
There’s no arguing the effort put into the text itself – and at almost 700 pages there’s clearly a wealth of author input. The book could have been spruced up perhaps with better stills rather than random B/W images on selected pages – but then that would have made this a very different book altogether.
This works well as a reference book as it has enough decent writing to help you delve deeper into a film’s subtext, and perhaps even encourage you to watch some of the films you may have missed over the years. And with the title in mind, we won’t be surprised if Muir follows with a book focused on the 00s.
Steven Hurst