We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.
The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ...
Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.
Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.
It’s as easy as 1, 2, 3… Well 26 anyway. Another round of 26 short horror films squeezed into under a couple of hours with only the alphabet to keep them linked together.
This second helping of the gory alphabet is a continuation of what fans loved/loathed from last time. 26 directors have each picked a letter of the alphabet, come up with a word that starts with that letter and then formed their horror short around said word.
Often it is gory, often it is sick, far too often nothing makes sense, and not very often is it coherent. Live action, animation and even Doll figures are used across an unholy blend of directorial styles.
Sadly there just isn’t enough segments that are any good to make the experience much of a joy to watch.
The film then ultimately suffers from exactly the same issue of the previous instalment. 26 films are simply too much for the brain to restart on. The quality is simply not up there in terms of a hit/miss ratio. There are way too many misses, and not even remotely enough stand out shorts to warrant the project in the first place. A few up and coming or name directors for sure – but this is not the work they will be remembered for.
Steven Hurst